TON (The Open Network) is backed by Telegram's 900 million+ user base and uses Ed25519 cryptography — a scheme vulnerable to Shor's algorithm on a quantum computer. BMIC implements NIST FIPS 203, 204, and 205 — the world's first finalised post-quantum cryptography standards. This page compares their security architectures, infrastructure, and long-term quantum posture.
Explore BMIC Presale →Every TON transaction exposes an Ed25519 public key on the blockchain. Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) can derive the corresponding private key from that public key. BMIC's NIST FIPS 203/204/205 lattice-based scheme has no known quantum speedup. This is a structural, protocol-level difference — not a product preference. DYOR before making any investment decision.
| Attribute | BMIC | Toncoin (TON) |
|---|---|---|
| Signature Scheme | ML-DSA (FIPS 204) + SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) | Ed25519 — quantum-vulnerable |
| Key Encapsulation | ML-KEM (FIPS 203) — lattice-based | ECDH / Curve25519 — Shor-vulnerable |
| Quantum Security | Native NIST PQC — built-in | None — no PQC roadmap (Aug 2026) |
| Smart Account Standard | ERC-4337 account abstraction | FunC / Tact smart contracts (TON VM) |
| Chain / Ecosystem | EVM-compatible (Ethereum) | TON (independent L1) |
| Stage | Presale — TGE Q2 2026 | Live — mainnet since 2021 |
| Media Coverage | 186+ media mentions | Thousands (major exchange listings) |
| Presale Raise | $530K+ (ongoing presale) | N/A — Telegram-backed, past ICO |
| Token Supply | 1.5 billion BMIC | ~5 billion TON (inflationary) |
| NIST FIPS Compliant | Yes — FIPS 203, 204, 205 | No |
| Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later Risk | Mitigated — lattice keys | High — all Ed25519 public keys exposed |
| Telegram Integration | Not applicable | Deep — Telegram Wallet, TON Space |
In August 2024, NIST finalised the world's first post-quantum cryptography standards. BMIC implements all three at the wallet and transaction layer:
Module-Lattice Key Encapsulation Mechanism (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber). Used for secure key exchange and session encryption. No known quantum speedup from Shor's or Grover's algorithms.
Module-Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium). BMIC's primary transaction signing scheme — replaces the ECDSA / Ed25519 used by TON, Bitcoin, and Ethereum.
Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (formerly SPHINCS+). Secondary backup scheme based on hash functions — quantum-hardened by design, independent of lattice assumptions.
Every TON transaction broadcasts the sender's Ed25519 public key to the entire network. Nation-state adversaries and well-resourced actors are already collecting this data. When a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) becomes operational — current estimates range from 5 to 15 years — Shor's algorithm can derive private keys from any harvested Ed25519 public key. TON's mainnet launched in 2021, meaning years of public key data is already accessible.
Ed25519 is an Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm built on Curve25519. Security relies on the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem (ECDLP): given a public key Q = k·G (where G is the generator point and k is the private key), classical computers cannot efficiently find k. However, Peter Shor's 1994 algorithm solves ECDLP in polynomial time on a quantum computer. Classical Ed25519 (256-bit) provides approximately 128 bits of classical security but effectively zero bits of quantum security.
TON's smart contract system (FunC, Tact, TVM) is sophisticated and supports complex programmable logic. However, smart contracts run above the account ownership layer. A TON account is controlled by an Ed25519 key pair — the smart contract cannot change this fundamental ownership model. Even a "v4" or multisig TON wallet still requires at least one Ed25519 key as its root of trust. The smart contract layer does not neutralise the underlying cryptographic vulnerability.
Telegram's integration with TON means hundreds of millions of users potentially interact with TON wallets through Telegram's interface. If TON's Ed25519 cryptography is compromised by quantum computing, the scale of potential exposure would be uniquely large compared to most other L1 blockchains. TON has not published any post-quantum migration roadmap as of August 2026.
A TON post-quantum migration would theoretically require:
Given TON's scale and its deep integration with Telegram's consumer product, coordinating this migration is significantly more complex than a pure developer-focused L1. No official PQC roadmap exists as of August 2026.
BMIC did not retrofit post-quantum cryptography onto an existing system. The NIST FIPS 203/204/205 standards are integral to the BMIC smart account architecture, not optional add-ons. ERC-4337 account abstraction enables quantum-safe signature validation at the account level without requiring a core Ethereum protocol change.
ERC-4337 separates account ownership from transaction validation. BMIC uses this to implement ML-DSA (FIPS 204) for transaction signatures, while remaining compatible with the Ethereum EVM. This means BMIC wallets can operate with post-quantum signatures without requiring Ethereum itself to hard-fork. It is a pragmatic, standards-compliant approach to the quantum migration problem.
August 2024: NIST published FIPS 203, 204, and 205 — the world's first finalised post-quantum cryptography standards. US government agencies were directed to begin migrating to these standards. BMIC's architecture is built on all three.
Google's Willow chip demonstrated sub-exponential quantum error correction — a critical engineering milestone. While not yet sufficient for cryptographic attacks, Willow showed that quantum error correction is a solvable engineering problem, not a theoretical barrier. The timeline for a CRQC became meaningfully shorter.
IBM's public quantum roadmap targets 100,000+ physical qubits by 2033. The 2026 models (Heron R2, Flamingo) demonstrate continued improvements in gate fidelity and qubit coherence. The gap between current devices and a CRQC is narrowing every year. Blockchain networks that have not started migrating are accumulating compounding exposure via the Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later threat.
Even without a CRQC today, adversaries can collect on-chain public keys now and store them at minimal cost. The attack cost is near zero today; only the decryption capability is future-dated. This is why NIST and CISA classify HNDL as an active, current threat — not a future hypothetical. Every Ed25519 public key broadcast by TON users today is potential HNDL material.
No. TON uses Ed25519 for wallet key pairs and transaction signatures. Ed25519 relies on the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem, which Shor's algorithm can solve on a sufficiently large quantum computer. TON has not published a NIST PQC migration roadmap as of August 2026.
BMIC implements NIST FIPS 203 (ML-KEM for key encapsulation), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA for digital signatures), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA as stateless hash-based backup) — the three post-quantum standards finalised by NIST in August 2024. These lattice and hash-based schemes have no known polynomial quantum speedup.
It potentially increases the scale of exposure. TON's Telegram integration means hundreds of millions of users could interact with TON wallets. If TON's Ed25519 cryptography is compromised by future quantum computing, the number of affected wallets and users could be significantly larger than most other blockchain networks. This is a structural risk that applies regardless of Telegram's product quality.
HNDL is a threat where adversaries collect encrypted data or public keys today, store them cheaply, and decrypt them once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) becomes available. For TON users, every transaction that has ever been sent exposes an Ed25519 public key on-chain permanently. BMIC's lattice-based keys are not vulnerable to this threat because no known quantum algorithm efficiently solves the underlying hard problems.
They operate in different ecosystems (EVM vs TON blockchain) and serve different primary use cases (quantum-safe smart accounts vs Telegram-native payments and DeFi). They are not direct substitutes. The comparison is most relevant from a long-term security architecture angle. DYOR — this is not investment advice.
Visit bmic.ai for the official BMIC presale. Always do your own research before investing in any cryptocurrency asset. This page is for informational and educational purposes only and is not investment advice.
Compare BMIC's post-quantum security posture against other major cryptocurrencies: